Home Internet of Things Australians selective about sharing data: survey

Australians selective about sharing data: survey

Australians are selective about sharing data with government agencies or commercial organisations, according to a survey conducted by global IT company Unisys.

Most Australians who were part of the survey did not support the use of data analytsics to sell them goods and services. About 62% did not back banks monitoring individual spending behaviour to offer related services such as insurance.

The survey of 1002 adults in April included questions about data obtained from IoT devices and also the use of data analytics. It was part of the 2017 Unisys Security Index – a global study that gauges the attitudes of consumers on a wide range of security issues.

It found that there were sharply contrasting reactions from the participants. For example, whoe 82% were willing to have a button on their smmartphones or smartwatches to alert police during an emergency, only 35% favoured police monitoring fitness tracker data to determine their location.

Again, while 75% were supportive of having medical devices or blood sugar sensors transmit data to a doctor, but only 29% were in favour of using a smartwatch to make payments or having a health insurer access fitness tracker data to find out which customers deserved a premium. The figure was lower at 26% for using such data to determine a reward for good behaviour.

“These findings highlight that when it comes to personal data there is a very delicate balance between privacy, security and convenience – even for organisations generally trusted by the public,” said John Kendall, director of border and national security programmes at Unisys.

“For example, people are happy to use their smartwatch to alert police to their location when they need help, but they don’t want police to freely access that data at any time – they want to control when they share their data.”


Three in four Australians backed border security staff wearing facial recognition bvody cameras to identify criminals or terrorists based on a watch list but only 29% backed the use of such technology to identify passengers for VIP treatment.

Richard Parker, vice-president financial services, Unisys Asia Pacific, said: “To address consumer concern around data security of smartwatch payment channels, banks need a multi-pronged approach that spans technology and policies to secure the data, as well as reassuring customers by communicating the steps taken by the bank to protect them – a fine line in delivering a frictionless customer experience whilst making sure they are secure.

He said about half the Australians surveyed supported a fingerprint scan to control access to data on a smartwatch (52%) or to authorise a payment from the smartwatch (48%). "This is a clear signal to banks that biometrics could help alleviate consumer concerns about smartwatch payment channels."

The survey found that 57% supported border security officers analysing travel histories in order to determine the suitability for fast-track border clearance. But this fell to 40% when it came to supporting welfare agencies accessing personal data from credit card spending and insurance policies to verify if benefit claims were legitimate.

The figure was even lower (32%) when the participants were asked if they supported the tax office using the same data to verify tax returns.

"Customers expect businesses to know them based on the history of their relationship. In a world where interactions may be across a range of channels and not just in person, many organisations are turning to data analytics to provide extra insight," said Parker.

"Ironically, while they may be trying to improve the customer experience, if businesses cross the line and appear to invade their privacy by revealing that they know more about them than what the customer has knowingly shared, it just turns the customer off. Technology alone is not enough; it must be used in the context of understanding human nature and cultural norms.”


Australia is a cyber espionage hot spot.

As we automate, script and move to the cloud, more and more businesses are reliant on infrastructure that has the high potential to be exposed to risk.

It only takes one awry email to expose an accounts’ payable process, and for cyber attackers to cost a business thousands of dollars.

In the free white paper ‘6 Steps to Improve your Business Cyber Security’ you’ll learn some simple steps you should be taking to prevent devastating and malicious cyber attacks from destroying your business.

Cyber security can no longer be ignored, in this white paper you’ll learn:

· How does business security get breached?
· What can it cost to get it wrong?
· 6 actionable tips



Ransomware is a type of malware that blocks access to your files and systems until you pay a ransom.

The first example of ransomware happened on September 5, 2013, when Cryptolocker was unleashed.

It quickly affected many systems with hackers requiring users to pay money for the decryption keys.

Find out how one company used backup and cloud storage software to protect their company’s PCs and recovered all of their systems after a ransomware strike.


Sam Varghese

website statistics

A professional journalist with decades of experience, Sam for nine years used DOS and then Windows, which led him to start experimenting with GNU/Linux in 1998. Since then he has written widely about the use of both free and open source software, and the people behind the code. His personal blog is titled Irregular Expression.


Popular News